Calm Amid The Season's Storm

By Chris Lavin

La Mesa Today Editor

LA MESA -- In a usual month, the City Council meeting is where you might come to measure the activity running through the fault lines of local politics. The dust ups between council members this past year or so have been frequent and often did measure on the political Richter scale.
But Tuesday night's meeting was a reminder of how elections impact everything. Here, the mayor and council, some involved in pretty heavy hand-to-hand combat on the political road these days, gathered almost to take a break, it seemed, and execute some routine business.

They bought a new police command truck, talked a bit about nuisance handbills landing on local lawns and made a few announcements about upcoming public events and committee activities. No angst, no fights, just the people's small town business.

In many ways, that scene contrasts sharply with the election campaign that has less than a week to go before decision night. Long-time political watchers in the Jewel of the Hills can't remember a campaign that has seemed to get so personal. Mailings -- anonymous and otherwise -- have filtered into boxes all over town. Great complaints and assertions are fashioned out of the thinnest of facts presented without benefit of balance, fairness or context. There are charges of whisper campaigns attempting to play to stereotypes and fears.

On the new electronic, Internet-based battlegrounds, the tone and untethered debate can swerve wildly from solid, community discussion to personal, almost bullying tactics, particularly where anonymity can shield the speakers.

It is tempting to blame the Internet for this coarsening of local political life. Everyone now has a bully pulpit and there are fewer and fewer unexpressed thoughts. Somehow cyberspace seems to require edgier and edgier tactics to feel seen and heard.

You could also blame the way campaign finance laws and the tactics they have spawned at the national and state level have trickled down into local politics. City Council candidate Guy McWhirter, by virtually every measure a solid, hard-working and dedicated community servant making his first run at public office, seems to have been coaxed by "advisers" down a slippery road of anonymous hit mailings without realizing the way it would play in a town that prides itself on being a "small town.''

To many, it seems there is more "outside" money funding a local political scene that was -- and probably still is -- determined more by candidates walking the neighborhoods, meeting voters in person and making an impression. All this Internet chatting and mailbox filling could be a triumph of the current popular form over substance -- or so it is hoped by traditionalists.

When you look at the seven candidates for mayor and City Council this year, there is one consistent theme across the board. All have served extensively for years in public and quasi-public roles in the community. All have extensive records of public service and performance that can be documented, measured and evaluated by the electorate. Do Art Madrid's years working the machinery of government outweigh the impressive years of government and community service City Councilman Mark Arapostathis brings to his candidacy? Voters will make a choice between two dedicated men.

Similarly, Bill Baber, Mary England, Patrick Dean, Pete Gregorovic and McWhirter bring a rich mix of public service and public records of performance and statements that leave little to imagine about these very public people.

Virtually all candidates -- particularly those who have lived and served for long periods -- may carry the blemishes of public and private lives. Tough development decisions that angered some. Divorces, bankruptcies, family challenges, the financial and professional setbacks that seem to touch all at some time.

What La Mesa can brag about this year, however, is a full slate of candidates with clear records of public engagement that do not require wondering how they will perform. They have been doing it in their different ways for decades.

Now it comes to a simple voter judgment of whose turn it is now to help lead a small city focused on preserving its quality of life.

There is a touch of fatigue that sets in at the end of all energetic campaign seasons. And it always seems that the anger generated amid the competition will color all going forward. But as residents and candidates left the routine City Council meeting Tuesday night, several were recounting details of an earlier, particularly caustic battle between Madrid and his then-rival Dave Allan, who challenged the mayor.

For those who watched, that election, won by Madrid, was followed by years in which Allan was seen as Madrid's closest ally.

As if to remind all that healing can happen, Councilman Ernie Ewin -- who is stepping out of elected office voluntarily this year -- circulated through the crowd inviting all the politicians and journalists to his off-the-record election-day lunch, an event meant to remind all that this is about more than personal ambitions.

 

Views: 909

Tags: , Art Madrid, Bill Baber, City of La Mesa, Dave Allan, Dean, Gregorovic, Guy, La, La Mesa, More…La Mesa City Council, La Mesa Mayor, La Mesa Today, Mark Arapostathis, Mary England, McWhirter, Mesa, Patrick, Pete, news, newspaper"

Comment

You need to be a member of La Mesa Today - Community Website & Online Newspaper to add comments!

Join La Mesa Today - Community Website & Online Newspaper

Comment by Kristin Kjaero on November 2, 2014 at 12:58pm

What matters is accuracy when filing campaign contribution reports. I don't have a stand on the Lincoln Club or the candidates, only transparency vs. misrepresentation. The bar must be higher than possibly -or possibly not- scraping by on legal technicalities; Bill Baber addressed the question of avoiding the appearance of impropriety in his radio interview with East County Magazine. (And with that, I'm signing off.)

Comment by Kristine Christensen Alessio on November 2, 2014 at 6:42am

So a group "sponsored by the Lincoln Club" made a contribution.  As you are well aware, "sponsored by" and part of are two quite separate things legally.  Try again Kristin.  There's still no evidence that Lincoln Club members have funded Mr Mc Whirter's campaign .  None at all.

Even if you can find the evidence, what does it matter?  It doesn't, groups and individuals have a right to give whatever they want to candidates and a right to support their candidate of choice.  I ask you once again to explain what in Mc Whirter's qualifications you don't like.  If taking money from someone who believes in you is the only thing, I would venture to say that you are not making an informed choice as to candidates.  

Comment by Kristin Kjaero on November 1, 2014 at 8:32pm

Happy to oblige, Ms. Alessio. There are too many pages to attach them all here, but these two demonstrate the name under which it is registered vs. what it was reported as.

Comment by Gene Carpenter on November 1, 2014 at 7:38pm
Comment by Kristine Christensen Alessio on November 1, 2014 at 4:53pm

I think there are a lot of conclusions being drawn without fact.  Assumptions are never good, there are no direct ties between the Lincoln and the other donors, so it's a tad erroneous to claim their "entities" have funded this election.  Please provide me with one piece of information showing that the Lincoln Club either has related "entities" or it's members made the donations.  Without that information,it's conjecture stated as fact.  If you don't like the candidates and what they stand for come on and identify what you believe their problems are, but don't wrap your argument against them around something other than fact.  

Comment by Gene Carpenter on November 1, 2014 at 12:59pm
Barry,

It's not the "secrecy" that's at issue (though the attempts by McWhirther to conceal should be) it's the unprecedented volume of cash from the Lincoln Club and the type of business interests that are providing it to Baber and McWhirther that should concern the Voters.
Comment by Kristin Kjaero on November 1, 2014 at 11:43am

Both yes and no, Barry; transparency is dependent on accurately filing reports. Candidates used only half of one entity's registered name, leaving off "sponsored by the Lincoln Club." At just under $33,000 this election cycle, it now makes the Lincoln Club entities the largest aggregate donor in City history -as far as I can tell- while only $8,000 appears with the Lincoln Club moniker attached, giving a wildly different impression. For McWhirter alone, this applies to $20,000, more than half his total contributions to date.

Comment by Barry Jantz on November 1, 2014 at 8:48am
No matter what one may think of the donations, there is nothing 'secret' about contributions made and reported in campaign disclosures as required by law.
Comment by Kristine Christensen Alessio on October 30, 2014 at 9:38pm

I am member of the Lincoln Club, and proud of it.  No matter what you may or may not want to decipher from their contributions, they stand for the people's rights, what everyday voters are concerned with, not some pie in the sky rhetoric.

Comment by Gene Carpenter on October 30, 2014 at 6:57pm
So what do Alpine and La Mesa have in common?

http://sdrostra.com/?p=39546

La Mesa Weather

HousingWire

La Mesa Photos

  • Add La Mesa Photos
  • View All

La Mesa Member Videos

  • Add La Mesa Videos
  • View All

La Mesa TODAY is news intended to promote the betterment of La Mesa and its nearby neighborhoods. We want members who share this goal.

© 2019   Created by La Mesa Today.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service