LA MESA -- One sensed during the recent election that if Councilwoman Ruth Sterling's efforts to aid challengers didn't succeed, she would find herself even more estranged from the incumbents on the five member body.
It didn't take long.
At the first post-election meeting, weighing the first substantive - albeit small dollar -- issue, the council split 4-1.
Sterling was the one.
Fresh off an election in which Mayor Art Madrid and council members Mark Arapostathis and Ernie Ewin visited frequently in all parts of La Mesa, the council quickly agreed to invest an extra $15,000 to expand the annual citizen services survey so that the results would give the council the ability to distinguish between citizen views by general neighborhoods.
Madrid, Ewin and Arapostathis all said they were reminded by their electioneering that La Mesa is a collection of different neighborhoods with different views on issues and they wanted the city's data collection to monitor those differences.
Sterling said past surveys didn't show great differences between quadrants of the city and her constituents want her to save money.
Madrid, reminding Sterling with only a touch of subtlety that he had recently done his own work among the constituents, said the better survey would give city staff better ammunition in the competition for grant monies. The city, he reminded, successfully competed for $11-million in grants last year.
Ewin, Arapostathis, and Councilman Dave Allan joined Madrid in granting the city manager's request for the better survey.
It is unlikely that all issues going foward will be 4-1. But on this first post-election night -- with Jim Wieboldt already declared as a challenger to Sterling's re-election in two years and sitting in the audience -- it was a vote that seemed to carry more meaning than weight.

Views: 43

Tags: Government

Comment

You need to be a member of La Mesa Today - Community Website & Online Newspaper to add comments!

Join La Mesa Today - Community Website & Online Newspaper

Comment by Scott H. Kidwell on November 14, 2010 at 8:13am
So just to be clear? We have to spend more of our own money to be better prepared to go begging, hat in hand, to the state government to retrieve our own money? And the state get's to dictate the terms in which we use the money they purloined from us in the first place? And this system further encourages the state to expand these schemes which places more pressure to raise state taxes and/or continue to take tax money that should be dedicated to local governments? Which causes local governments to cry to it's constituents, "We need to raise local taxes to cover the shortage from the state"? Which also causes the local government to need to go begging, hat in hand, to the State for grants? ..............
Comment by Karen Pearlman on November 9, 2010 at 8:42pm
PERFECT POST!!

La Mesa Weather

HousingWire

La Mesa Photos

  • Add La Mesa Photos
  • View All

La Mesa Member Videos

  • Add La Mesa Videos
  • View All

La Mesa TODAY is news intended to promote the betterment of La Mesa and its nearby neighborhoods. We want members who share this goal.

© 2019   Created by La Mesa Today.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service