Love where you live!
Are the rights which we possesses unalienable, as described in our nations founding documents, or are they conferred upon us by the society to which we belong? Are rights and liberty to be determined by the legislative authority in view of the needs of that society? Social expediency, rather than natural right, is thus to determine the sphere of individual freedom of action?
And is the great question for our day not really about health care and the like, but is within arguments about such? Shall we retain and reenforce that "we the people" are the sovereign and uphold our Constitution that limits the intrusions government may make on personal liberty or shall we follow the path of progressives from Woodrow Wilson, John Dewey and FDR through to President Obama wherein the Constitution is a "living document" to be interpreted as expediency is determined by an educated, enlightened and well meaning ruling class where natural individual unalienable rights are subordinate to a newer and ever evolving "social contract?"